Regular Sensing =============== The size of deterministic automata required for recognizing regular and $\omega$-regular languages is a well-studied measure for the complexity of languages. We introduce and study a new complexity measure, based on the {\em sensing\/} required for recognizing the language. Intuitively, the sensing cost quantifies the detail in which a random input word has to be read in order to decide its membership in the language. Technically, we consider languages over an alphabet $2^{P}$, for a finite set $P$ of signals. A signal $p \in P$ is sensed in a state of the automaton if transitions from the state depend on its value. The {\em sensing cost of an automaton\/} is then its expected sensing, under a uniform distribution of the alphabet, and the {\em sensing cost of a language\/} is the infimum of the sensing costs of deterministic automata for the language. Beyond the theoretical interest in regular sensing, it corresponds to natural and practical questions in the design of finite-state monitors, as well as controllers and transducers. We show that for finite words, size and sensing are related, and minimal sensing is attained by minimal automata. Thus, a unique minimal-sensing deterministic automaton exists, and is based on the language's right-congruence relation. For infinite words, the minimal sensing may be the limit of an infinite sequence of automata. We show that the unique limit of such sequences can be characterized by the language's right-congruence relation, which enables us to find the sensing cost of $\omega$-regular languages in polynomial time. Also, interestingly, the sensing cost is independent of the acceptance condition. This is in contrast with the size measure, where the size of a minimal deterministic automaton for an $\omega$-regular language depends on the acceptance condition, a unique minimal automaton need not exists, and the problem of finding one is NP-complete. We also study the affect of standard operations (e.g., union, concatenation, etc.) on the sensing cost of automata and languages.